diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 7 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ my personal workflow. There are more to come, the list will be updated: - [x] **Scrollbar** for better navigating. - [x] **Sort Entries** by column (`Authors`, `Title`, `Year`, `Pubtype`) - [x] **Load multiple files** into one session. -- [x] **Add Entry via DOI** as formatted code. +- [x] **Add Entry via DOI**. - [ ] **Open related notes file** for specific entry. - [ ] **Implement config file** for setting some default values like main bibfile, PDF-opener, or editor @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ Use the following keybindings to manage the TUI: | `PageDown`, `PageUp` \| `Alt-j`, `Alt-k` | Scroll Info window | | `y` | Yank/copy citekey of selected entry | | `e` | Open editor at selected entry | +| `a` | Add entry through DOI | | `o` | Open related PDF or URL/DOI | | `TAB` | Switch between entries and keywords | | `/`, `Ctrl-f` | Enter search mode | @@ -237,9 +238,7 @@ Loading a test file containing 25.000 dummy entries as well as a directory containing 25.000 single dummy `.bib` files `bibiman` was significantly faster on startup than both other programs. The performance also did not suffer. Only on a test file with more than 50.000 dummy entries a very short delay after -keypresses was recognizable when scrolling the entry list. This is very likely -due to the effect of the single entries being dimmed differently regarding their -position to the selected one which needs some CPU resources. +keypresses was recognizable when scrolling the entry list. After all, `bibiman` is really fast and runs very smooth while having the most complex user interface by far compared to the other programs. |